(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] gnomentum.livejournal.com at 09:39am on 18/06/2010
*Speechless*

This is even legal??
[parent entry] [link] [reply]
 

(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] elanya.livejournal.com at 12:46pm on 18/06/2010
I like to think that an ethics review board really should have shut it down, but I don't think it went through one properly.

Apparently in the UK it is definitely illegal.
[link] [parent] [reply]
 

(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] cheez-ball.livejournal.com at 05:17pm on 18/06/2010
Yes, it's illegal! What he did differed from what he presented to the IRB.

It's discussed at the bottom of the first page of the Psychology Today entry. And the first and second authors claim they had no knowledge of his follow up exam activities. WTF?! How can you be a first author and not know the content of your own paper?
[link] [parent] [reply]

May

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
        1
 
 2
 
 3
 
4
 
 5
 
 6
1
 7
 
 8
 
 9
 
 10
 
11
 
 12
 
 13
 
 14
 
 15
 
 16
 
 17
 
18
 
 19
 
 20
 
 21
 
 22
 
 23
 
 24
 
25
 
 26
 
 27
 
 28
 
 29
 
 30
 
 31