Part of the reason women were generally taboo at sea was that there was no defined 'female space' on ships?
Also - look at perception of subversion in marginalized groups (how pirates were believed to organize themselves in comparison with the 'norm' - this i a trick to get to use Snelgrave ;)
Also - look at perception of subversion in marginalized groups (how pirates were believed to organize themselves in comparison with the 'norm' - this i a trick to get to use Snelgrave ;)
(no subject)
But... aren't all ships 'she'?
Even the ones named after famous male admirals and such?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
There were women on ships, though - they were just ognored/overlooked because, conceptually, they shouldn't have been there.
(no subject)
(no subject)
I suspect that if there were female constructed space, it would have been easier to accept them - though Steve is right to say that this requires understanding why there was no assigned female space to begin with.
Which in turn mght have something to do with the idea of men taking over traditional female roles (cooking, again, for example)... Although often seacooks were sailors who were no longer capable of filling other shipboard roles due to age or infirmary... Anyway.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Although as Charles pointed out, we do have the whole ship *as* female thing to run with too (at least in English).
Which makes, I've thought, an interesting contrast to the sea as female (but with diferent, more dangerous, qualities).
Maybe I just ought to focus on gendered space in/on ships eh? :V
(no subject)