Having my work edited by other people makes me more aware of some of my consistent grammatical errors. I often abuse the terms 'which' and 'due'. I am inconsistent about using commas after all elements of a short list (before the 'and'). I sometimes have difficulty avoiding using the passive voice. I have a thing for prepositional phrases, and use them often to avoid using possessives for inanimate objects. I would much rather say, for example " The tines of the fork' than 'the fork's tines'. And it really is a matter of animate versus inanimate. How bizarre o_O. I also really like using colons: they are just nifty. I have checked a number of different writing references and they are ambivalent as to whether or not you need to capitalize the second phrase. I think it looks dumb, so I'm not doin' it! If you're going to capitalize, you may as well not bother with the colon. I just have to try to use them more sparingly, as overuse can undermine their impact. Oh and finally, I have a penchant for abusing commas, mostly putting them in places where they aren't strictly necessary, or marking superfluous verbal pauses. Rar!
Well, I am hoping that my awareness of these idiosyncrasies will not pass, and I can actually use this experience to improve my writing, There isn't always going to be a Carl around to viciously edit my works and beat me over the head with The Chicago Manual of Style and The Elements of Style
Well, I am hoping that my awareness of these idiosyncrasies will not pass, and I can actually use this experience to improve my writing, There isn't always going to be a Carl around to viciously edit my works and beat me over the head with The Chicago Manual of Style and The Elements of Style
(no subject)
There are certain ways of writing that are clear, unambiguous, concise, and follow the basic rules of English grammar. It's good to do that! But all the crap about the Oxford comma, capitalization after colons, 'that' vs. 'which', and avoiding the passive voice can drive you mad if you let it, but ultimately most of those so-called 'rules' are just individual stylistic preferences that have become codified, often in ridiculous ways.
If you have a specific style guide, like Chicago, that you are supposed to use, then I *suppose* I can, reluctantly, see the need to follow that style. But really, virtually all of it is all very, very silly.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Ha!