elanya: Sumerian cuneiform 'Dingir' meaning divine being/sky/heaven (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] elanya at 11:20am on 09/09/2004
So, I have ranted about this theory class before. The impression I am starting to get is that this proff doesn't really put too much stock in theory, period.

Today, we talked about documents, artifacts, and how to use them (sort of).

One of the types of documents we talked about that can be vaguely useful, or that at least show how different sources can be used (I am not quite clear on the point, precisely) was historical fiction.

So, guess which author got brought up? Now, I will say first off, that my proff is a fairly old, ex-mil civil war reenactor. he has this attitude that if you haven't done something, you really can't know what you're talking about when you want to write about it. he's very big into living history.

Anyway, so, yes., We spent at *least* ten minutes of class listening to him talk about Dianna Gabbledon. Only he pronounces it "GaBULdun", which is odd. I was the only person ion the class who knew who he was talking about, let alone had read any of them. Totally made me think of you.

His opinion, in any case, is that she is really accurate with some of her details, but someone really needs to sit her down and tell her about guns. Apparently his wife keeps telling him that it should be him ;)

Hee! I hope this has brought you some little amusement for the day ^-^
Mood:: 'silly' silly
There are 6 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] skjaere.livejournal.com at 08:31am on 09/09/2004
That's awesome! He sound e-mail her or something. I know she uses lots of people as resources, and is very big on being as accurate as possible within the constraints of the story she wants to tell. I'm getting the urge to re-read....
 
posted by [identity profile] elanya.livejournal.com at 08:40am on 09/09/2004
I told him she is in very good contact with her fans ;)
 
posted by [identity profile] vureoelt.livejournal.com at 10:39am on 09/09/2004
Why they romanticize a bloody and painful event so much is beyond me...
 
posted by [identity profile] elanya.livejournal.com at 12:32pm on 09/09/2004
The thing is, thought, that they don't, not really. Reencators tend to have a healthy respect for the people they are imitating, and a better grasp on the real problems than a lot of other folks.
 
posted by [identity profile] gnomentum.livejournal.com at 12:56pm on 09/09/2004
Hear Hear.

I don't know much about Civil War but I DO know that most 15C re-enactors I know are pretty switched on to the horrors of war.

Normally the general pubic come up with their own conceptions of what was uncomfortable or nasty about the period, but they NORMALLY talk about things which I for one find quite easy to adjust to and totally miss out on the real point.

The thing is, war is hell whatever period of history you look at. Field medicine in the past was better than most people think.. but as far as I can see not much, REALLY, has changed. I'd hate to be in the army as much now as way back when.
 
posted by [identity profile] vureoelt.livejournal.com at 12:58pm on 09/09/2004
I didn't mean romanticized in that sense. I meant that there seems to be this whole prevalent attitude towards the South and how they miss it and stuff. Which is what draws them to reenactment in the first place. That they want to learn about what happened and almost... celebrate it or something.

I'd think a few moments of silence woulld be more appropriate.

May

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
        1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6 7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31