(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] cheez-ball.livejournal.com at 05:17pm on 18/06/2010
Yes, it's illegal! What he did differed from what he presented to the IRB.

It's discussed at the bottom of the first page of the Psychology Today entry. And the first and second authors claim they had no knowledge of his follow up exam activities. WTF?! How can you be a first author and not know the content of your own paper?
[parent entry] [permalink]

Reply

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting
 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.

May

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
        1
 
 2
 
 3
 
4
 
 5
 
 6
1
 7
 
 8
 
 9
 
 10
 
11
 
 12
 
 13
 
 14
 
 15
 
 16
 
 17
 
18
 
 19
 
 20
 
 21
 
 22
 
 23
 
 24
 
25
 
 26
 
 27
 
 28
 
 29
 
 30
 
 31