The fact theat when we break down the dsicussion to this level, I wind up agreeing with you on so many points makes me wonder how differently we really understand things. I mean, I'm sure I could follow this discussion back up and coem to points of theory, or at least philosophy where we really diverge... But... still. Is that the stuff that really mater, on a pracyical level? I'm not sure I understand what I mean right here, or at least I don't kthink I'm expressing myself clearly, and I don't know how to do a better job right at the moment :p
Re: Definition/limitation as the essence of Theory