Definition/limitation as the essence of Theory (Reply).
Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1
|
2
|
3
|
||||
4
|
5
|
6 |
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
I wonder, if I were to say that I see postmodernism as being my personal paradigm, or philosphy... It represents my world view, but that I reject it as a useful applicable working theory in social science and archaeology, if that would make sense, or if it is just a copout? I really don't believe that there is an absolute truth, or that only one understanding that is even *desirable*. I think that this leave me open to select the most useful tool, or theory, for examining a particular problem, or issue.
This would probably be more coherent if I hadn't have 6 hours of class today, three of them all at once, and if it weren't 11 PM :P
Anyway, I don't know if you will give me any more replies, but I have quite enjoyed this dialogue to date :)